home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!demon!alladin.demon.co.uk
- From: ajackson@alladin.demon.co.uk (Action Jackson)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: 4000 Vs 4000
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1996 17:40:25 GMT
- Message-ID: <821468526.12961@alladin.demon.co.uk>
- References: <4ct42u$qa7@cdn_news.telecom.com.au> <wfblanDKzuzG.Jpn@netcom.com> <philw-1101962154340001@philw.users.xplor.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: alladin.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: alladin.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- philw@xplor.com (P A Williamson) wrote:
-
- >In article <wfblanDKzuzG.Jpn@netcom.com>, wfblan@netcom.com (Wells Fargo
- >Bank) wrote:
-
- >>
- >> The only differences I am aware of is that the new A4000T system is built
- >> by Amiga Technologies rather than Commodore and the new A4000T also comes
- >> with a SCSI II Controller that the A4000 didn't come with before.
- >
- > Didn't I read that the new 4000T has the 040 on the Motherboard? If so,
- >did that solve the memory performance problem the original 4000's had?
-
- No it doesnt. CPU is on the daugther board (and people say computers
- arnt built for women). What problem are you refering to? Slow Chip RAM
- access or Zorro III problem. Zorro III problem has been fixed. Not
- sure about the slow chip RAM access!!
-
-